Macro 2 Summary#

Table of Contents:

Labour Market#

Wage and Effort#

= individual worker

  • wage set in contract, depends on

    • reservation wage = outside option

    • disutility of effort

    • employment rent

=> firms set wage based on effort level needed (HR Department)

Wage Setting#

= whole economy

  • based on unemployment in economy

  • gives general wage level (nominal)

=> higher unemployment = lower nominal wage

individual

whole economy

img

img

Prices#

= at individual firms

Firms Decision at given Wage based on

  • Demand

  • Competition

  • Markup needed for shareholders

=> prices / level of output and number of needed workers

Price Setting#

= whole economy

  • all prices combined lead to price level

  • real profit per worker (\(\Pi/P\))

  • real wage per worker (\(W/P\))

=> only depends on competition

indivudual firm

whole economy

img

img

Equilibrium#

  • Wage Setting: Wage at given Effort

  • Price Setting: Prices at given Markup

leads to

  • least wage for effort

  • maximum employment

  • Involuntary unemployment (due to incomplete contracts!)

img

Model reaction to lower AD:

  • higher unemployment

  • lower wages along the WS-curve

  • lower prices for goods

  • higher demand for goods = higher labor demand

  • more employment back at equilibrium

Problem: Sticky Wages! and savings

Solution: Government Intervention to expand Demand (Monetary or Fiscal)

Banks#

lets just hope that banks dont play a big role in the exam…

Business Cycle#

Definitions#

Type of Fluctuations in capitalist economies of aggregate economic activity between contraction and expansion

Okuns Law: Connection between Cycle and Unemployment

Recession: Significant decline in economy-wide activity

GDP: Gross Domestic Product, calculated in different ways:

  • Income

  • Spending

  • Value added in Production

Spending: \(Y = C+I+G+X-M\)

Smooth Consumption#

individuals smooth consumption (to have higher quality of life)

  • Borrowing from future income

  • saving / repaying in high-income times

limited by:

  • credit constraint

  • weakness of will

  • limited insurance

img

Consumption: lagging GDP, highly correlated

Volatile Investment#

Investment = depends on expectations regarding BC

Contraction

Expansion

img

img

leads to self-enforcing business cycles

Investment: leading GDP, high volatility

Government Expediture#

Share of Government spending on% of GDP (\(b\))

  • varies across countries

  • depends on taxes / other income

  • finacable by debt / money print

Government Expenditure: less volatile than GDP, not dependent on expectations

Stylized Facts#

img

Volatile

Correlation

Persistence

Leading / Lagging

Investment = more volatile than GDP

Consumption / Investment = correlated to GDP

GDP + Investment = persistent

Investment = leading GDP

Inflation = less volatile

Infaltion | GDP = no strong correlation

G Exp + Employment = very persistent

Employment = lagging GDP

Multiplier Model#

Consumption Function:

  • autonomous consumption (from smoothing): \(c_0\)

  • income dependent consumption: \(c_1*Y\)

    • based on marginal propensity to consume

  • 45° Line = Aggregate Demand = Aggregate Supply

    • Everything needed is supplied (at less than full capacity)

Change in Output / Income: never relevant, moves along the line

Change in AD: relevant, because it moves the line (e.g \(I, G, c_0\) change)

  • exampe: higher Investment

  • moves Consumption Line upwards

  • multiplied by after round effects

Multiplier: \(k = \frac{ 1 }{1-c_1}\)

img

Influences on the Multiplier Model#

Fiscal Policy = dampen Fluctuations in AD

Multiplier influenced by

  • Exports / Imports = make Stimulus more difficult

  • high credit constrained = more effective multiplier

  • Capacity of Economy

AD and Unemployment#

Connection of both Models

  • Supply Side: Labor Market Model

  • Demand Side: Multiplier Model

Assumption: \(N = Y\)

Government#

Role = Fiscal Policy in Crisis, when k > 1 (output gap)

img

  • Budget Deficit: \(\Delta B = G+iB-T\)

  • Primary Deficit: \(G-T\)

  • Budget Constraint: \(T + \Delta B = G+iB\)

Important equations#

  • \(\Delta b = g-t+(r-y)b\) : debt ratio dynamics

  • \(b^* = \frac{ g-t }{y-r}\) : equilibrium debt ratio

    • \(b^* < 0\) = creditor

    • \(b^* > 0\) = debtor (should be at least)

Phase Lines#

Stability of Debt

  • if \(r-y < 0\) (growth higher than interest) = repayment always possible

  • if \(r-y > 0\) (high interest rate) = debt spirals out of hand

stable creditor

unstable creditor

2023-08-02_11-21-03

img

Default Risk#

  • default probability: \(\omega\) (determined by credit agency)

  • \(i_0\) = riskless asset

Government Interest Rate:

\[ i = \frac{ i_0+\omega }{1- \omega} \]

Default Risk: \(\omega = \omega_0 + \beta i\) (Debt ratio and interst are in calculation)

Risk of Spirals: interest rate \(\uparrow\) = debt burden \(\uparrow\) = risk \(\uparrow\) = interest rate \(\uparrow\)

Bond Rating (R) and interest rate:

img

Inflation#

Inflation: increase in general price level

Philipps Curve#

Correlation between Unemployment and Inflation (inverse relationship)

Higher unemployment = lower wages = lower prices = lower inflation

img

=> the philipp curve shifts with expectations of inflation! (staglfation)

Bargaining Gap#

Difference between:

  • Wage firms want to offer for optimal effort (Wage Curve)

  • Wage for optimal markup (Price Curve)

=> inconsistent claims in output

possible Reasons:

  • higher firmpower = higher markup = lower PS

  • higher union power = higher wages = higher WS

  • more employment = WS \(\to\)

Inflation and AD#

Combination of

  • short run model (Multiplier Models)

  • and medium run (efficiency wage model)

Effect of Boom:

  • lower unemplyoment

  • WS curve to the right

  • higher wages + bargaining gap

  • higher prices

  • Wage price Spiral

AD

Wage

Phillips

2023-08-02_12-18-10

2023-08-02_12-18-22

2023-08-02_12-18-30

Expectations#

Friedman: Expectations are integrated into inflation => no long term suprise infaltion possible

Phillips Curve Tradeoff not possible!

Situation:

  • normal inflation = 3%, Bargaining Gap = 2%

  • workers demand wage rise of 5%

  • but inflation next year = 5% => demand 7%

depends on static expectaions \(\pi^e = \pi_{t-1}\)

Spiral of Inflation:

img

Monetary Policy#

Tools:

  • interest rate, influences

    • market interest rates (investments)

    • asset values

    • expectations

    • exchange rate

  • Quantiative Easing

Assumptions of effective MP:

  • independence

  • above zero bound

  • flexible exchange rate

  • own currency

Problems:

  • Trust needed

  • Fiscal Policy = can have opposing goals

Preferences of CB#

Loss Function: \(L = b(U-U^*)^2+(\pi-\pi^*)^2\)

Optimisation: \(U = U_n - a (\pi-\pi^e)\) (Phillips Curve with Expectations)

=> Surprise inflation = incorporated = not worth it

defines rule-based inflation targeting:

img