29.11.2023 Asymmetric Information & Social Insurance#
4 Questions for public economics
When intervenve?
How intervene?
What is the effect?
Why do governments choose to intervene the way they do
Asymmetric Information#
Akerlof: Market for Lemons
Buyer does not know the „real“ value of the car
Seller does know, mistrust
=> asymmetric information => market failure => government intervention
Car Insurance Market#
high risk people = 5% chance of accident in year
low risk people = 0.5% chance of accident
cost of car accident = 30.000$
actuarially fair premiums:
low risk: \(0.005 \times 30.000 = 150\)
high risk: \(0.05 \times 30.000 = 1500\)
Insurance Company wiht 100 people of each group
low risk calculation:
income: \(150*1000 = 15.000\)
damage payments: \(30.000 \times 0.05 \times 100 = 15.000\)
income = payment = 0 profit
high risk similar
But: asymmetric information!
insurance company cant tell the difference
averagy insurance premium in the middle
low risk people wont pay
high risk people will profit and drive company bankrupt
separating equilibrium
insurers offers two contracts
full coverage of 30k at 1500$ premium
partial coverage up to 10k at 50$ premium
but still market failure (financial risk persists)
Adverse Selection#
Adverse Selection: market situation where buyers and sellers have different information => unequal distribution of benefits to both parties
Example: Harvard Death Spiral
2 plans of Helath insurance
full benefits with premium
lower benefits with no premium
in crisis, higher prices for 1., healthy people change
Social Insurance#
German System
Health Insurance (1883)
Accident Insurance (1884)
Pension Insurance (1889)
Unemployment Insurance (1927)
Long-term Care Insurance (1995)
Characteristics
solidarity
mandatory
Benefit is tied to certain event (unemployment, sickness, needs care)
Reasons for government intervention#
Asymmetric Information
Externailities (e.g vacciation in health)
Administrative Costs
Redistribution
Paternalism
Samaritans Dilemma
Problems: Crowd Out of Self Insurance
e.g Consumption Smoothing before unemployment
due to saving, borrwing, family etc
only very partial crowd out
Moral Hazard#
ex ante: changes in behavior that affect insured risk (smoking => lung cancer)
ex post: after risk has materialized (cancer => want every possible treatment)
Problems of Moral Hazard
increase cost
higher taxes => deadweight loss